Sports madness at The Ohio State University continues even
after all these years, despite the "bowl ban"...How could it not?
In the wake of the Jerry Sandusky controversy at rival Pennsylvania State University, a news feature announced a new coach for the Buckeye Football Team, Urban Meyer. He was hired for a contract worth over $27 million for four years hard labor.
In the wake of the Jerry Sandusky controversy at rival Pennsylvania State University, a news feature announced a new coach for the Buckeye Football Team, Urban Meyer. He was hired for a contract worth over $27 million for four years hard labor.
Okay, you might call it sour grapes. My husband used to be a
mathematics professor at Ohio State, doing hard labor for peanuts, relatively, measured
in the thousands of dollars, rather than millions. Yet no one in the entire
world, not just America, could do the exact same academic discipline in
mathematics as my husband could do because he invented it.
Back then, Columbus, Ohio, seemed football-crazy. All the
traffic lights were green around the stadium after a game. Hotels filled, food sources benefited…Obviously,
nothing has changed about the way the University rewards the sports program for tourism and entertainment reasons.
Which other country on the entire planet, at a major
university funded primarily through taxes, had a group of people who agreed
that a coach of a single sport deserved greater rewards of money and outside
benefits than the most brilliant scholars at that same university and the
President? The practice is widespread, I hear, and how crazy is that?
Imagine if this scenario were turned around. Supposing
football became associated with the least prestige and monetary reward within
the university? Suppose many of the players received life-threatening
concussions from playing the sport? Woudn't decent citizens take pity on the
players and, with a flash of decently good conscience, stop the program? I'm
dreaming of utopia.
Ohioans and the parents of Ohio State University students
keep cheering. They pay that much for a sports coach to the detriment, at the
cost, of the primary university function - the teaching and researching duet. They place
him on an ivory pedestal. Professors aren't paid much, aren't on an ivory
pedestal, because the sports program needs the money, or so the rumor goes.
What is the history of American football?
Modestly it expanded from a game history suggest was played
between Harvard and McGill University in 1874, following an earlier 1859 game
between Princeton and neighboring Rutgers University.
My point is that the sport of American football is new,
unproven, and anti-academic. Paying astronomical rates to sports coaches at
universities is also new, and completely newsworthy. Why have universities
taken to rewarding sports at the expense of academic pursuits? It's crazy.
The idea that donors pay the universities on the strength of
the football program and tickets sold can be discounted by searching Google for
the endowments of private universities in general, which are far higher than
those of public universities. Private universities do not focus on popular football mega-events, not on the same
scale.
I think universities are unbalanced when they reward sports
more than the disciplines that they ethically, often with government funding,
have the mandate to fulfill.
And exactly where are girls, women, females, children, and
infants, in all this talk of football? Forgotten, irrelevant, useless,
unnecessary???...